🔗 Share this article

Some battle royale enthusiasts are experiencing let down, and it's not due to the latest virtual happenings. Fortnite's current limited-time event, that introduces a Simpsons-themed world, also rolled out a fresh mechanic called sidekicks. It's impossible to ignore that the latest pets are adorable. However, the attached costs have made many fans shocked at this developer's attempts to profit from almost every part of the game.

Understanding Sidekicks?

Companions are basically similar to digital creatures, but with a few drawbacks. Players can give them a name, and they will accompany your character during a match. These sidekicks are indestructible, and you can interact with them. Opposing gamers outside the player's squad are unable to view sidekicks — and showing off one's companions is perhaps half the enjoyment of owning them. Sidekicks can be customized with outfits and gestures, but the controversy revolves around their appearance. A pet's overall design is only able to be altered one time, at which point that selection becomes final. Players can select a sidekick's fur shade, secondary colors, iris tones, pattern, and their body type.

A Expensive Personalization System

Should a player afterward decide that you want your sidekick to appear slightly altered, it's not possible to just continue to customize the look. You have to purchase a new companion. And, these pets aren't cheap. Most people are getting the banana-themed pet, since it's packaged with the current battle pass. Based on unofficial reports, future pets could be priced at from 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; for reference, 1,000 V-Bucks is priced at $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks cost $22.99. You can rename a sidekick whenever they want.

Community Reaction and Parallels

Most pets have not been officially launched yet, meaning the cost could easily change. But regardless of whether the developer makes companions cheaper, much of the frustration stems from the reality that gamers could have to spend for a single kind of sidekick more than once. For some, the cost structure feels particularly egregious when the game has previously added companions that are carried around as part of back blings. Backpack pets lack a restriction on changes and are visible by other players in the game. Backpack pets cannot be given a name or perform emotes, but opposing gamers are able to occasionally engage with them — and this is more favorable than being invisible completely.

Lack of special functions and limited engagement choices have numerous players experiencing disappointed. Why can't you, for example, interact playfully with your stylish banana dog? Some point out that companions sometimes fail to stay close with the user if a game is moving quickly, or mention that the banana pet takes up two spots in the battle pass — and this supports the notion that the company is pressuring the community for money. Greedy is a word that's appearing frequently in such conversations, with some comparing sidekick pricing to other intense monetization models in games like EA Sports FC. Additionally, it doesn't help that certain pets are projected to be more expensive than their character skin versions.

"PLEASE do not purchasing Sidekicks," urges a popular online post that advises fellow players to figuratively vote with their wallets.

"We understand these pets are cute," the post continues, "I know they're enjoyable. We are aware everyone has been anticipating them. But the monetization focus on display is disgusting and must not be supported."

The Bigger Context of In-Game Spending

Over the past few years, the game's special occasions and collaborations have grown in scale and aspiration, yet the free-to-play game still needs to earn revenue. As such, the total quantity of cosmetics players are able to now buy has become nearly excessive. In addition to standard items like back accessories, gliders, pickaxes, and gestures, you could possibly use money on shoes, music tracks, instruments, Lego pieces, cars, wheels, vehicle drift colors, battle passes, and a membership. Companion pets not only cost payment, and also bring in a range of new monetization options for the developer. It is likely, players will soon be in a position to spend for items like pet looks, outfits, gestures, and additional interaction options.

All of these cosmetics are entirely optional and not necessary to have fun with the experience, yet equipment can nonetheless influence your community experience. Younger players, for instance, at times face bullying for not wearing flashy enough skins. A comparable situation previously transpired when the company introduced licensed shoes, which may be priced from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The footwear cost model wasn't well received either, and some fans vowed that they wouldn't fall prey to the temptation at the time. But ultimately, buying shoes became commonplace. Today, sidekicks are additionally pushing the boundaries of what a player could be prepared to pay to be distinctive amongst the crowd.

What is Ahead for Companion Pets?

Pets are still a fairly recent addition, and they're part of a game that changes frequently. A few fans are sharing that they've received a questionnaire that assesses how the community feel about pet functionality and pricing, which could potentially indicate that the developer's strategy are still fluid. But if Fortnite footwear are a sign, sidekicks likely won't get more affordable overall — instead, there may be a broader range of costs to choose from.

After all, while some individuals are raging at Fortnite item costs, different players are feeling only happiness for their competitive friends.