🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, though, may align too neatly with the mythologized version circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series released last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from disorder. While he is called a different name, the implication is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story instead of undercutting it. An adaptation based on a popular book aims to undermine the Putin cult by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, the president is shown as having been picked by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to become president. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with him to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with many contenders. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, including a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who researched his rise, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in Dresden fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier interpretation prompted local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Edited images swapping Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by viewers there, the authorities will not miss the opportunity to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. His influence is signaled through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.